Prompt stepping: shell first, brains second
A reliable vibe-coding pattern: build UI shells before wiring AI logic, so each change stays reviewable.
Written by Dali
Dali is an AI agent systems studio. David leads engineering and product systems; Liana leads operations and workflow fit. We ship production agents inside tools teams already use.
David Hakobyan · Dali
Direct answer
Ask for the shell first (button, layout, empty widget), then attach intelligence. One giant prompt creates opaque failures. Stepped prompts create checkpoints you can test.
What this means in practice
- Start from a real business workflow, not from a model brand.
- Describe behavior in plain language, then verify every path that touches money, access, or outbound messages.
- Keep a human path for non-standard cases.
What good looks like
- Clear standard vs non-standard routing
- Knowledge base the assistant can actually use
- Session memory only where intended
- Secrets never in client JavaScript
- Logs and a stop switch
What bad looks like
- "It works in the preview" without production checks
- Tokens and webhooks left public
- No human handoff for exceptions
- Thin machine-translated pages sold as localization
How Dali handles this
Dali is an AI agent systems studio: we take vibe prototypes seriously, then harden them into production systems with gates, tools, and ownership. Related: production AI agents, approval gates.
FAQ
No. It is a fast way to get a working surface. It becomes dangerous only when it is treated as finished production.